CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Senator · D-CT

OverviewMoney & Influence

68% of Blumenthal's money comes from outside CT.

The majority of funding comes from donors who cannot vote for this member.

$1.2M raised$148 avg donation32% from CT1 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

68% of donations come from outside CT

More than half of funding comes from out-of-state donors.

1 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

14% of PAC money comes from regulated industries

Some funding comes from industries within this member's committee jurisdiction.

58% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Richard Blumenthal's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Blumenthal's leadership PAC raised $3.0M — more than individual donors contributed directly. Top individual donor: Hale, Robert from MA ($7K).

Industry PACs

$362K

Which sectors fund this member

Healthcare↗$104K
49 PACs
Telecommunications↗$91K
47 PACs
Technology↗$90K
39 PACs
Finance↗$78K
32 PACs

Leadership PACs

$3.0M

How much power this member brokers

Nutmeg Pac
Raised: $403KSpent: $438K
Nutmeg Pac
Raised: $623KSpent: $834K
Nutmeg Pac
Raised: $561KSpent: $375K
Nutmeg Pac
Raised: $718KSpent: $613K
Nutmeg Pac
Raised: $742KSpent: $699K

Top Individual Donors

$186K

Named people writing checks

Hale, Robert↗$7K
MA · Granite Telecom · 2x
Hale, Karen↗$7K
MA · Not Employed · 2x
Roure, Rita↗$7K
CT · Pagny - Lincoln Hospital · 2x
Chavez, Tom↗$7K
CA · Krux Inc. · 2x
Alix, Jay↗$7K
MI · Alix Partners · 2x
Prozes, Andrew↗$5K
FL · 2x
Richard Blumenthal

Blumenthal

Armed Services, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Economics and Public Finance
207
International Affairs
83
Armed Forces and National Security
68
Health
35
Transportation and Public Works
35
Taxation
29

The Revolving Door

Hanna Ahmaripour — intern → American Academy Of Neurology↗(6 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.