CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Nicholas Begich

Nicholas J. Begich III

Representative · R-AK-0

OverviewMoney & Influence

29% of PAC money comes from industries Begich's committee regulates.

A significant share of funding is tied to this member's legislative authority.

$567K raised$116 avg donation47% from AK3 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

53% of donations come from outside AK

More than half of funding comes from out-of-state donors.

3 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

29% of PAC money comes from regulated industries

Some funding comes from industries within this member's committee jurisdiction.

47% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Nicholas J. Begich III's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Political is the largest PAC sector at $81K from 66 PACs.

Industry PACs

$238K

Which sectors fund this member

Political↗$81K
66 PACs
Transportation↗$78K
35 PACs
Energy↗$47K
25 PACs
Technology↗$32K
12 PACs

Leadership PACs

$74K

How much power this member brokers

Nb3 Pac
Raised: $43KSpent: $40K
Nb3 Pac
Raised: $31KSpent: $13K

Top Individual Donors

$2.7M

Named people writing checks

Nicolos, Tom↗$13K
AK · 36x
Moody, Daryl↗$13K
GA · Church · 28x
Odom, William L↗$13K
AK · Odom Corp · 4x
Hall, Jess↗$12K
AK · Hall Quality Homes · 4x
Lindsey, Tammi↗$11K
AK · 7x
Hinger, Cristin↗$11K
AK · 4x
Nicholas Begich

Begich

Natural Resources, Science, Space, and Technology

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Congress
113
Economics and Public Finance
52
Energy
32
Armed Forces and National Security
31
Crime and Law Enforcement
24
Public Lands and Natural Resources
24

The Revolving Door

Ashley J. Smith — director of operations → Torrey Advisory Group (formerly Michael Torrey Associates, Llc); American Clean Power Association↗(28 filings)
Breanna C. Klayum — director of operations → Windward Strategies↗(20 filings)
Jackson A. Williams — staff assistant → Dialysis Patient Citizens↗(2 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.