CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Charles Fleischmann

Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann

Representative · R-TN-3

OverviewMoney & Influence

5 former staff now lobby Fleischmann's office.

Former employees have moved to lobbying firms connected to this member's work.

$693K raised$1749 avg donation64% from TN5 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

5 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

24% of PAC money comes from regulated industries

Some funding comes from industries within this member's committee jurisdiction.

79% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

64% of donations come from TN

The majority of funding comes from within the member's home state.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Top individual donor: Ostrow, Lane from NC ($14K). Energy is the largest PAC sector at $288K from 165 PACs.

Industry PACs

$850K

Which sectors fund this member

Energy↗$288K
165 PACs
Defense↗$228K
156 PACs
Technology↗$168K
86 PACs
Healthcare↗$166K
93 PACs

Leadership PACs

$386K

How much power this member brokers

Nooga Pac
Raised: $49KSpent: $47K
Nooga Pac
Raised: $150KSpent: $139K
Nooga Pac
Raised: $119KSpent: $121K
Nooga Pac
Raised: $66KSpent: $65K
Nooga Pac
Raised: $1KSpent: $0

Top Individual Donors

$1.8M

Named people writing checks

Ostrow, Lane↗$14K
NC · Spectra Tech · 4x
Faison, Jay↗$14K
NC · Clear Path Foundation · 4x
Debusk, Brian↗$14K
TN · Deroyal · 4x
Ostrow, Eleanor↗$14K
NC · Spectra Tech · 4x
Wagner, Janet↗$14K
TN · Sutter Davis Hospital · 4x
Mckee, Christopher↗$14K
TN · Mckee Bakery · 4x
Charles Fleischmann

Fleischmann

Science, Space, and Technology

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Congress
902
Economics and Public Finance
649
Armed Forces and National Security
468
Government Operations and Politics
313
International Affairs
290
Finance and Financial Sector
204

The Revolving Door

Andrew C. Palmer — legislative assistant → Rich Feuer Anderson↗(255 filings)
Robert C. White — deputy chief of staff-dist opr → Indiana Farm Bureau, Inc; Indiana Farm Bureau, Inc; Robert White Associates, Inc.↗(36 filings)
William D. Sitton — legislative correspondent → Invariant Llc; Red Bull North America, Inc.↗(23 filings)
Taylor L. Childress — staff asst/legis correspondenc → Clearpath Action For Conservative Clean Energy, Inc.↗(5 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.