CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Lindsey Graham

Lindsey Graham

Senator · R-SC

OverviewMoney & Influence

80% of Graham's money comes from outside SC.

The majority of funding comes from donors who cannot vote for this member.

$3.6M raised$181 avg donation20% from SC

Key Findings

80% of donations come from outside SC

A supermajority of Lindsey Graham's funding comes from donors who cannot vote for them.

52% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

No revolving door connections detected

No former staff were matched to registered lobbyists.

Low committee-donor overlap

PAC funding shows minimal connection to industries regulated by this member's committee.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Lindsey Graham's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Graham's leadership PAC raised $3.6M — more than individual donors contributed directly. Top individual donor: Kay, Alison from CA ($18K).

Industry PACs

$854K

Which sectors fund this member

Energy↗$267K
150 PACs
Political↗$208K
44 PACs
Transportation↗$191K
70 PACs
Finance↗$188K
73 PACs

Leadership PACs

$3.6M

How much power this member brokers

Fund For America's Future
Raised: $504KSpent: $482K
Fund For America's Future
Raised: $672KSpent: $649K
Fund For America's Future
Raised: $644KSpent: $1.1M
Fund For America's Future
Raised: $1.1MSpent: $733K
Fund For Americas Future
Raised: $638KSpent: $581K

Top Individual Donors

$3.0M

Named people writing checks

Kay, Alison↗$18K
CA · Kids Capital · 4x
Rehnert, Geoff↗$18K
MA · Audax Group · 4x
Singer, Paul↗$18K
FL · Elliott Investment Management · 3x
Fisher, Kenneth L.↗$17K
TX · Fisher Investments · 4x
Hillman, Tatnall L. Capt.↗$14K
CO · 5x
Frost, Phillip↗$14K
FL · Opko Health Inc · 5x
Lindsey Graham

Graham

Environment and Public Works, Judiciary

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Economics and Public Finance
207
International Affairs
83
Armed Forces and National Security
68
Health
35
Transportation and Public Works
35
Taxation
29

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.