CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Jared Moskowitz

Jared Moskowitz

Representative · D-FL-23

OverviewMoney & Influence

$631K raised.

Here's where it came from and where it went.

$631K raised$585 avg donation56% from FL2 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

2 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

56% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

56% of donations come from FL

The majority of funding comes from within the member's home state.

Low committee-donor overlap

PAC funding shows minimal connection to industries regulated by this member's committee.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Jared Moskowitz's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Top individual donor: American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action Committee from DC ($21K). Education is the largest PAC sector at $109K from 33 PACs.

Industry PACs

$338K

Which sectors fund this member

Education↗$109K
33 PACs
Agriculture↗$88K
31 PACs
Energy↗$75K
36 PACs
Healthcare↗$66K
35 PACs

Leadership PACs

$176K

How much power this member brokers

The Mpire Strikes Pac
Raised: $53KSpent: $12K
The Mpire Strikes Pac
Raised: $122KSpent: $114K

Top Individual Donors

$2.1M

Named people writing checks

American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action Committee↗$21K
DC · Conduit Total Listed In Agg. Field · 24x
Horvitz, David↗$15K
FL · Southocean Capital Partners · 7x
Klarman, Seth↗$14K
MA · The Baupost Group · 4x
Zaffirini, Carlos↗$13K
TX · Ahcv · 3x
Hackman, Michael↗$10K
CA · Hackman Capital Partners · 3x
Mindlin, Brad↗$10K
NV · Oro Capital Advisors · 3x
Jared Moskowitz

Moskowitz

Judiciary

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Economics and Public Finance
319
Congress
280
Armed Forces and National Security
154
Energy
139
International Affairs
135
Government Operations and Politics
88

The Revolving Door

Lane H. Lofton — shared employee → Ncta - The Internet & Television Association↗(5 filings)
Lale M. Morrison — chief of staff → Giffords↗(3 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.