CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Alejandro Padilla

Alex Padilla

Senator · D-CA

OverviewMoney & Influence

$2.2M raised.

Here's where it came from and where it went.

$2.2M raised$99 avg donation70% from CA2 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

2 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

12% of PAC money comes from regulated industries

Some funding comes from industries within this member's committee jurisdiction.

54% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

70% of donations come from CA

The majority of funding comes from within the member's home state.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Alex Padilla's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Padilla's leadership PAC raised $2.7M — more than individual donors contributed directly. Healthcare is the largest PAC sector at $168K from 65 PACs.

Industry PACs

$538K

Which sectors fund this member

Healthcare↗$168K
65 PACs
Technology↗$143K
52 PACs
Finance↗$115K
43 PACs
Agriculture↗$112K
37 PACs

Leadership PACs

$2.7M

How much power this member brokers

Defend The Dream
Raised: $926KSpent: $953K
Defend The Dream
Raised: $1.5MSpent: $1.3M
Defend The Dream
Raised: $304KSpent: $251K

Top Individual Donors

$515K

Named people writing checks

Koenig, Jane↗$7K
CA · Not-employed · 2x
Koenig, William↗$7K
CA · Not-employed · 2x
Tule River Tribal Council↗$7K
CA · 2x
Horowitz, Ben↗$7K
NV · Andreessen Horowitz · 2x
Chen, Yu↗$7K
FL · Not-employed · 2x
Zhao, Peng↗$7K
FL · Citadel Securities · 2x
Alejandro Padilla

Padilla

Energy and Natural Resources, Environment and Public Works

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Economics and Public Finance
146
International Affairs
41
Armed Forces and National Security
33
Transportation and Public Works
28
Science, Technology, Communications
25
Environmental Protection
20

The Revolving Door

Alyson Sincavage — chief counsel → Cisco Systems, Inc; American Immigration Lawyers Association↗(10 filings)
Jessica Fernandez — intern → Townsend Public Affairs↗(9 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.