CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
James Risch

James E. Risch

Senator · R-ID

OverviewMoney & Influence

92% of Risch's money comes from outside ID.

The majority of funding comes from donors who cannot vote for this member.

$1.2M raised$1021 avg donation8% from ID2 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

92% of donations come from outside ID

A supermajority of James E. Risch's funding comes from donors who cannot vote for them.

2 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

26% of PAC money comes from regulated industries

Some funding comes from industries within this member's committee jurisdiction.

74% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — James E. Risch's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Top individual donor: Fingeret, Jeremy from TX ($12K). Energy is the largest PAC sector at $265K from 144 PACs.

Industry PACs

$694K

Which sectors fund this member

Energy↗$265K
144 PACs
Political↗$161K
39 PACs
Technology↗$141K
57 PACs
Transportation↗$128K
41 PACs

Leadership PACs

$1.1M

How much power this member brokers

Save America Pac
Raised: $0Spent: $0
Pac For America
Raised: $72KSpent: $111K
Save America Pac Ii
Raised: $0Spent: $0
Save America Pac
Raised: $0Spent: $0
Pac For America 2
Raised: $21KSpent: $2K

Top Individual Donors

$1.7M

Named people writing checks

Fingeret, Jeremy↗$12K
TX · 1x
Kayali, Zeid↗$12K
CA · Physician · 4x
Kteleh, Tarek↗$11K
IN · Rheumatology · 5x
Debbane, Raymond↗$11K
CT · The Invus Group Llc · 3x
Frank, Shane↗$10K
TX · Alliantgroup · 1x
Frank, Shane↗$10K
TX · 1x
James Risch

Risch

Energy and Natural Resources, Intelligence

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Economics and Public Finance
207
International Affairs
83
Armed Forces and National Security
68
Health
35
Transportation and Public Works
35
Taxation
29

The Revolving Door

Grant Mckenzie — assistant scheduler tooct.25 → Ducks Unlimited, Inc↗(8 filings)
Spencer M. Smith — press assistant → Crowell Global Advisors; Access Partnership Corp↗(3 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.