CHECKMYREP
  • Members
  • Votes
  • Data
  • About
CHECKMYREP
HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
CHECKMYREP

Congressional Accountability Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Contact
  • Support

© 2026 CheckMyRep. All rights reserved.

HomeMembersCompareIssuesContact
← Back to Profile
Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez

Gabe Vasquez

Representative · D-NM-2

OverviewMoney & Influence

62% of Vasquez's money comes from outside NM.

The majority of funding comes from donors who cannot vote for this member.

$1.3M raised$349 avg donation38% from NM2 former staff → lobbyists

Key Findings

62% of donations come from outside NM

More than half of funding comes from out-of-state donors.

2 former staff now work as lobbyists

Former employees have transitioned to the lobbying industry.

15% of PAC money comes from regulated industries

Some funding comes from industries within this member's committee jurisdiction.

53% of money comes from large donors (>$1,000)

A significant share of funding comes from major individual donors.

How Does Money Flow Through Congress?

An interactive guide to the influence pipeline

Show ↓Hide ↑

How It Works

The Influence Pipeline

How money flows to — and through — Gabe Vasquez's office.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

The cycle repeats.

01
The Company

The Company

A corporation wants a law passed or blocked.

02
The PAC

The PAC

Direct donations are illegal. So employees pool money into a Political Action Committee.

03
The Target

The Target

PACs fund members on committees that regulate their industry.

04
⚖️

The Committee

These committees write the laws that affect the donor's business.

05
🚪

The Revolving Door

Former staff become lobbyists for the same industries that fund their old boss.

06
📋

The Lobbying

Those lobbyists push specific bills before their former colleagues.

07
🗳️

The Vote

Your representative votes — and the pattern is clear.

The cycle repeats.

Follow the Money

Education is the largest PAC sector at $147K from 42 PACs.

Industry PACs

$484K

Which sectors fund this member

Education↗$147K
42 PACs
Defense↗$124K
76 PACs
Political↗$107K
49 PACs
Energy↗$106K
68 PACs

Leadership PACs

$60K

How much power this member brokers

Pac A Punch
Raised: $39KSpent: $15K
Pac A Punch
Raised: $22KSpent: $21K

Top Individual Donors

$5.4M

Named people writing checks

Carpenter, Allegra↗$15K
NM · Attorney · 12x
Baker, Brenda↗$14K
CA · Not Employed · 6x
Helm, Nelson Jr↗$14K
KY · 4x
Klarman, Seth↗$14K
MA · The Baupost Group · 4x
Bekenstein, Anita↗$14K
MA · 4x
Sussman, S. Donald↗$14K
FL · Paloma Partners Advisors Lp · 5x
Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez

Vasquez

Agriculture, Armed Services

→

Votes Cast by Policy Area

Economics and Public Finance
319
Congress
280
Armed Forces and National Security
154
Energy
139
International Affairs
135
Government Operations and Politics
88

The Revolving Door

Laura R. Peterson — legislative director → Laura Wood Peterson Consulting, Inc.↗(89 filings)
Lane H. Lofton — shared employee → Ncta - The Internet & Television Association↗(5 filings)

Deep Dive

How we built this & what it doesn't prove
  • • Donor data from FEC filings (9.47M individual contributions)
  • • Voting records from Congress.gov roll call data
  • • Lobbying data from Senate LDA filings
  • • Staff employment from House disbursement records

Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members may vote in alignment with donors because they share genuine policy beliefs, not because of financial influence. We present the connections — you decide what they mean.